Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Quew

Fukushima round two?

46 posts in this topic

http://www.prisonplanet.com/breaking-earthquake-hits-near-fukushima-nuclear-plant-tsunami-expected-to-hit-reactor.html

 

Another earthquake on and around the fukushima area with the crippled reactors fun for none.

Good luck japan

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fukushima-plant-undamaged-after-7-3-earthquake-off-coast-of-japan.html

 

No additional damage from the looks of it.

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/japan-reacts-to-fukushima-crisis-by-banning-journalism.html

 

Nov. 28 The government works to silence any new news about Fukushima

Edited by Quew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather large different in earthquake sizes, it would be like comparing a bird flying into a skyscraper to the 9/11 attacks.

Also, that site is the epitome of terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you should understand that the reactors are already crippled and they are having loads of trouble without disasters even making things look like they are under control.

 

That is your opinion, however my opinion is that the site is in fact not terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you should understand that the reactors are already crippled and they are having loads of trouble without disasters even making things look like they are under control.

 

That is your opinion, however my opinion is that the site is in fact not terrible.

They still have an undamaged sea wall that was much taller than the wave that could have been produced from such a quake. Any claims otherwise were simple scaremongering, or conspiracy nuts getting excited.

You want some reliable news sites?

http://uk.reuters.com/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/

Helps that they're not run by a famously crazy talk show host.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Any claims otherwise were simple scaremongering, or conspiracy nuts getting excited.)

This is your opinion, i prefer to watch each thing and see what happens rather then just assume i know.

I have seen lots of people that act like you do be wrong not once not twice but constantly so i prefer to do things my way.

 

You want anyone to trust a news agency run by a government? any government?

Did you not get a good history lesson on that kind of thing in school?

 

Again what you say is your opinion, and my opinion is that he is no crazier then anyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/25/world/asia/japan-earthquake/

 

I would trust BBC and Reuters much more than I would trust "Prison Planet," aka conspiracynuts.com.

 

Come on why destroy a good story just because it might not be true? It is not like this is in any way a serious thing, right? :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then Gandalf you would be in the minority, it is not trendy anymore to dismiss real news.

Did you know the amount of radiation that is deemed as safe by government agencies like the EPA have been on the rise since around the time that Fukushima first got hit, and did the big state media agencies make a big deal about it as soon as it happened, was it shoved in your face so you had to think about what it means for your life or did it pop up here and there but not given the importance due it so that you and others could ignore it, and when someone shows you it is happening and show you it is a threat you can then feel justified in calling them names because you and others see the hosts on these state media outlets making fun of dismissing or in some other manner insulting people for trying to help for going against the narrative set forth.

 

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2162

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-approves-raising-permissible-levels-of-nuclear-radiation-in-drinking-water-civilian-cancer-deaths-expected-to-skyrocket/5331224

http://www.peer.org/news/news-releases/2013/04/08/white-house-approves-radical-radiation-cleanup-rollback/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2013/04/10/epa-draft-stirs-fears-of-radically-relaxed-radiation-guidelines/

 

Take a look around Mr.Wizard we live in an era where people in government and on government pay rolls have to be scrutinized more closely then ever because the people before us trusted them too much and stopped holding them accountable.

If you like the direction of how nations like America are going right now then please continue to listen to the state media and pretend that they are telling you everything you should be allowed to know.

 

Prison planet has proven to be a better source of news then any i have seen listed here.

 

Bad Tobiash jumping on the bandwagon like that.

Edited by Quew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you like the direction of how nations like America are going right now then please continue to listen to the state media and pretend that they are telling you everything you should be allowed to know.

i_m_ok_with_this__n1296497202304__super.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "safe limit" for radiation is amazingly low. It could be increased x10 with very little noticable impact on the population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for you Mr. Wizard some none isolated incidents over in America.

 

Bad training and hiring cowardly/insane/damaged people to be cops results in things like this

http://nationalreport.net/police-taser-multiple-children/

http://www.infowars.com/video-dallas-cop-shoots-man-who-stood-perfectly-still/

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/texas-cop-shoots-unarmed-teen-hiding-woodshed

and lots more.

personally this is not a direction i want to see things go in but if you are comfortable with paramilitary cops on the street then you should have no problem with these things.

 

TSA the two primary types of people who end up working for this agency are desparate people and sexual predators of all kinds

http://wizbangblog.com/2012/10/14/the-tsa-molestation-files-dana-loesch/

http://rt.com/usa/tsa-rape-room-wife-179/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57441730-504083/priest-defrocked-for-child-sex-abuse-now-works-for-tsa-report-says/

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101202/17372012098/tsa-told-to-tell-children-that-groping-them-is-game-horrifying-sex-abuse-experts.shtml

But i am sure you are comfy with all this.

 

The state media is no longer leading the charge when it comes to news, places like infowars and others formerly known as alternative news sites are now the mainstream so as a result you will hear about big news stories months after i do because the intolerance and bigotry that has been drilled into you about some of these groups rules your thinking process.

Humans tend to model behavior when dealing with with situations new to them because of this and the bad attitude and general disrespect shown to people and ideas that do not align with the status-quo or in-crowd coming from what was once called the mainstream media creates that disrespectful activity you and others have shown, and as for me well a long time ago i did not watch much news but i still saw others acting badly so i started mimicing it as a reflex, in fact i still have to filter myself now and then because i catch myself planting some bit of nastyness in my messages but it is more rare now so it is possible for us and everyone to learn to do better if we want to.

 

You should love this my italian freind

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh, good old Ann Coulter... My favorite comedian...

 

Also, pretty much any media you can possibly name is bias and will in fact, only report what they want you to hear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "safe limit" for radiation is amazingly low. It could be increased x10 with very little noticable impact on the population.

Did you mean to say 'amazingly high'? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Historically, Mario(italiarule) is a stuck up piece of ******** that doesn't do anything when he takes over alliances, and Gandalf is a brown noser. So why would I not believe Quew?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pandora first understand that regardless of bias if there is a certain group or person paying all of your bills or protecting you from certain laws your going to lean favorably to them and if they want you to say something you have little or no ability to resist them and this is the condition of government media and media that is heavly funded by governments such as CNN if the funding they get from government was pulled there business would fold up over night they are not getting enough money from other areas to stand on there own and they are not the only formerly mainstream media outlet in this condition.

Italiarule the time that they decided to start raiseing the radiation limits was after the Fukushima incident.
The nuclear lobby had already taken a gut punch for publicity with the event so to prevent further sucker punches they lobbyed to have the radiation limits raised in the USA up in Canada they even shut off the radiation detectors on the west coast so in conclusion you have the interpratation of events backwards.
The raising of radiation limits was entirely political.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/japanese-physician-calls-for-evacuation-of-tokyo.html

This may be comeing to the American west coast even without further damage from disaters or incompitence.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/island-of-debris-the-size-of-texas-from-2011-japanese-tsunami-is-headed-straight-for-the-u-s.html

Because people like you think that radiation is ok there are going to be plenty that grab some of the inbound junk and spread around some more of the radiation.
There is a lot of radiation in the ocean because they have to use water to keep the crippled reactors under control and what happens to that water they can't store it all so what can not be stored gets released into the ocean.

http://enenews.com/diseased-seals-abnormal-brain-growths-undersized-lymph-nodes-found-russia-canada-walruses-next-6-photos-map

This is an article from a few years ago a few months after the fukushima event Alaska got hit harder by the radiation then the American/Canadian west coast.
Now you might point out that in this article they are not sure what the cause is but if you look over the symptoms and the timeing this makes radiation poisoning a high probability.

http://www.naturalnews.com/032087_radiation_sickness_symptoms.html

An article about the symptoms of radiation sickness.

Even without natural disasters this cyber warfare crap governments are engageing may end up leading to another wave of Fukushima failures.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/america-and-israel-created-a-monster-computer-virus-which-now-threatens-nuclear-reactors-worldwide.html

But regardless if another event natural or manmade happens it is going to be bad news for everyone.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/top-scientist-another-fukushima-quake-would-mean-us-evacuation-bye-bye-japan.html

Nuclear power is something Man kind can not handle.
Maybe if civilization lasts long enough we can set up proper methods of researching and useing such dangerous technologies, but right now Nuclear power is the single most dangerous form of power presently in large scale use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quew is my favorite new member.

Did they ever find the fuel rods? I hope they don't get washed out into the sea. Even if they find them,how will they remove them since the crane on-site was destroyed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NMA
My understanding of events when the reactor went up at least a portion of the rods landed in the water but i have not seen anything specific on that so it is only a guess, however even without the rods in the water there is still enough radiation to be a threat.
As for how they intend to remove the rods i am not sure i have not looked much into that part of events.

http://www.infowars.com/fukushima-plant-readies-for-removal-of-dangerous-fuel-rods/

A week old article.
But as i said this part is not something i have looked much into.

Pandora
I think you misunderstand i do not pick on CNN out of some poltical bias while giveing media outlets like FOX a free pass they are under a similar condition but they are not quite as far down the deadmans drive as others are because they at least part of the time pretend to be in favor of what most Americans think of as the American culture.
I poke CNN because it was related to that media agency that i first understood in a manner that i could describe how the relationship between government and corperate spheres operated.

A few days after the Fukushima disaster march 11 2011 i started buying and putting kelp salt/powder into some of my food in order to increase the amount of good iodine in my body with the following understanding.
Even if i never get impacted by the radiation directly the poor levels of iodine in the average diet this stuff will still help my health but if it does have an impact on me this stuff will protect me from some of the effects, just a heads up this stuff tastes funky so if you decide to use it make sure to smother the flavor and try to aim for stuff that is made in none radiated areas.

 

My prefered search engine is.

 

https://www.startpage.com/

Edited by Quew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My only major problem with fox is their moto "Fair and Balanced". I can't stand such a lie. They should have something more opposite to MSNBC's "Lean Forward"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i can agree that motto everytime i would hear it when i was listening to a radio station that had fox on it i started finding ways to auto mock it when i would hear it just cause i did not want that phrase sinking into my brain.

 

Lean Forward hmm sounds Marxist.

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/japan-reacts-to-fukushima-crisis-by-banning-journalism.html

Looks like it will be getting harder to get new information about the situation now.

Edited by Quew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nuclear power is the safest energy source out there, and the fearmongering never ceases to irritate me. Without the anti-nuclear movement, we would be in a much better situation with regard to climate change right now.

 

(also, protip for the OP: if you want to be taken seriously and listened to, don't use conspiracy websites such as infowars, prisonplanet, globalresearch, and whaleto as sources)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nuclear power is the safest energy source out there, and the fearmongering never ceases to irritate me. Without the anti-nuclear movement, we would be in a much better situation with regard to climate change right now.

 

(also, protip for the OP: if you want to be taken seriously and listened to, don't use conspiracy websites such as infowars, prisonplanet, globalresearch, and whaleto as sources)

Agreed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

I have never been able to understand why so many people who call themselves environmentalists, consistently oppose a safe, clean power source that has negligible harm for the environment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the same reason I oppose the artificial creation of anti matter.

Lets assume a global apocalypse happens and only a few survive.

What happens to all this stupid ******** we make? Its reliant on human regulation.

So these few survivors are pretty much ********ed because their ancestors were cheap ********s who put convenience above logic.

And nuclear waste isnt something the environment wants. Were already raping the earth and doing it faster and faster every day. I mean, there were 5 billion less people here before oil.

But now Im just going on about the inevitable global overpopulation that will soon happen, because humanity is inherently stupid.

Also, the topic of this thread is another good reason.

"If it happens once, it will happen again."

But lets just throw up a bunch of nuclear reactors and say "******** nature!" I mean, its not like nature is out of our control or anything....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0